Pet Drug Reports

Months › 2014

Month received

February 2014: adverse event reports received

4,320 reports in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026

4,320reports received
4,659same month a year earlier-7%
5,732monthly average, preceding 12 months
75.3%concern dogscats 8.4%

FDA's database holds 4,320 adverse event reports received in February 2014, against 4,659 in the same month a year earlier and a monthly average of 5,732 over the preceding 12 months.

75.3% of the month's reports concern dogs, 8.4% cats and 1% horses; the rest concern other species, exposed people, or give no species.

By active ingredient, the drugs named most often were milbemycin oxime + spinosad (1,279), ivermectin + pyrantel pamoate (570) and spinosad (382), and the terms listed most often were emesis (994), lack of efficacy - NOS (545) and lethargy (455). Report volume has a seasonal shape, with more reports in the warmer months when parasite products are in heavier use.

The months around it

03,4856,969Aug 2012: 6,486Sep 2012: 5,629Oct 2012: 6,230Nov 2012: 4,961Dec 2012: 4,041Jan 2013: 5,0222013Feb 2013: 4,659Mar 2013: 5,164Apr 2013: 6,147May 2013: 6,737Jun 2013: 6,721Jul 2013: 6,914Aug 2013: 6,509Sep 2013: 6,116Oct 2013: 6,159Nov 2013: 5,048Dec 2013: 4,141Jan 2014: 4,4702014Feb 2014: 4,320Mar 2014: 5,032Apr 2014: 5,903May 2014: 6,291Jun 2014: 6,492Jul 2014: 6,969Aug 2014: 6,823

← Jan 2014Mar 2014 →

Drugs named most often, by active ingredient

Active ingredients recorded for the drugReportsShare of the month's reports
Milbemycin Oxime + Spinosad1,27929.6%
Ivermectin + Pyrantel Pamoate57013.2%
Spinosad3828.8%
Oclacitinib2235.2%
Selamectin1623.8%
Lufenuron + Milbemycin Oxime1533.5%
Cyclosporine1443.3%
Imidacloprid + Moxidectin1232.8%
Carprofen1112.6%
Ivermectin + Praziquantel + Pyrantel Pamoate1112.6%
Ivermectin982.3%
Moxidectin912.1%
Melarsomine Dihydrochloride791.8%
Cefovecin sodium671.6%
Insulin641.5%

Ordered by report count, which follows how widely each drug was in use. FDA states that these data cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. Brand and manufacturer names are masked by FDA in these records.

Signs listed most often

  1. Emesis[vomiting]23%994
  2. Lack of efficacy - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect]12.6%545
  3. Lethargy[unusually tired or inactive]10.5%455
  4. Vomiting8.9%385
  5. Ineffective, heartworm larvae[legacy FDA term: the product did not have the expected effect (heartworm larvae)]6.7%290
  6. Uncoded sign[a sign with no matching dictionary term]6%261
  7. Diarrhoea[diarrhea]6%259
  8. Digestive tract disorder NOS[digestive problem, type not specified]4.4%191
  9. Ineffective, ascarids NOS[legacy FDA term: the product did not have the expected effect (ascarids nos)]4%171
  10. Anorexia[not eating]3.9%169
  11. Other abnormal test result NOS[abnormal laboratory result, type not specified]3.8%166
  12. Cardiac disorder NOS[heart problem, type not specified]3.5%152
  13. Lack of efficacy (endoparasite) - hookworm[the product did not have the expected effect: hookworms]3.2%140
  14. Unpalatable[legacy FDA term: the animal would not take it]3.2%138
  15. Seizure NOS[seizure, type not specified]3.1%136

Single ingredients, pooled

Species

Dog75.3%3,252
Cat8.4%362
Horse1%43
Other or not given15.3%663

Questions about February 2014

How many animal drug adverse event reports did FDA receive in February 2014?

4,320 reports are in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026. The same month a year earlier has 4,659.

Which drugs were named most often?

By active ingredient: milbemycin oxime + spinosad (1,279), ivermectin + pyrantel pamoate (570), spinosad (382), oclacitinib (223) and selamectin (162). Brands are masked in the public data.

Which signs were listed most often?

emesis (994), lack of efficacy - NOS (545), lethargy (455), vomiting (385) and ineffective, heartworm larvae (290).

Can the count for a month still change?

Yes. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Older months change little.

Does a busy month mean something went wrong that month?

Not by itself. The date is when FDA received the report, not when the event happened, and volume follows season, product launches and publicity. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources."

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. The month is the date FDA first received the report, not the date of the event. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.