Pet Drug Reports

Months › 2000

Month received

June 2000: adverse event reports received

3,621 reports in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026

3,621reports received
958same month a year earlier+278%
1,213monthly average, preceding 12 months
72.6%concern dogscats 12.5%

FDA's database holds 3,621 adverse event reports received in June 2000, against 958 in the same month a year earlier and a monthly average of 1,213 over the preceding 12 months.

72.6% of the month's reports concern dogs, 12.5% cats and 0.8% horses; the rest concern other species, exposed people, or give no species.

By active ingredient, the drugs named most often were selamectin (2,012), selegiline hydrochloride (714) and carprofen (398), and the terms listed most often were lack of efficacy (ectoparasite) - flea (526), vomiting (452) and depression (361). Report volume has a seasonal shape, with more reports in the warmer months when parasite products are in heavier use.

The months around it

01,8113,621Dec 1998: 3,078Jan 1999: 4221999Feb 1999: 481Mar 1999: 1,017Apr 1999: 778May 1999: 585Jun 1999: 958Jul 1999: 1,449Aug 1999: 614Sep 1999: 817Oct 1999: 1,022Nov 1999: 2,420Dec 1999: 926Jan 2000: 9112000Feb 2000: 1,095Mar 2000: 1,395Apr 2000: 1,170May 2000: 1,784Jun 2000: 3,621Jul 2000: 1,294Aug 2000: 1,585Sep 2000: 1,640Oct 2000: 1,495Nov 2000: 1,344Dec 2000: 814

← May 2000Jul 2000 →

Drugs named most often, by active ingredient

Active ingredients recorded for the drugReportsShare of the month's reports
Selamectin2,01255.6%
Selegiline Hydrochloride71419.7%
Carprofen39811%
Milbemycin Oxime501.4%
Lufenuron + Milbemycin Oxime401.1%
(S) - methoprene381%
Etodolac320.9%
Moxidectin250.7%
Amoxicillin230.6%
Diethylcarbamazine Citrate230.6%
Enrofloxacin160.4%
Atipamezole Hydrochloride150.4%
Ivermectin140.4%
Lufenuron140.4%
Sulfadimethoxine130.4%

Ordered by report count, which follows how widely each drug was in use. FDA states that these data cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. Brand and manufacturer names are masked by FDA in these records.

Signs listed most often

  1. Lack of efficacy (ectoparasite) - flea[the product did not have the expected effect: fleas]14.5%526
  2. Vomiting12.5%452
  3. Depression[dull, quiet or withdrawn]10%361
  4. Lack of efficacy (ectoparasite) - tick NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: ticks]9%326
  5. Anorexia[not eating]8.8%318
  6. Diarrhoea[diarrhea]8.2%298
  7. Accidental exposure[exposure that was not intended]5.2%187
  8. Pruritus[itching]4.6%166
  9. No sign[no clinical sign was reported]4.2%151
  10. Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (SAP)[a liver and bone enzyme above the normal range]3.2%115
  11. Application site alopecia[hair loss where the product was applied]3.1%114
  12. Death3.1%111
  13. Ineffective, loss of effect[legacy FDA term: the product did not have the expected effect (loss of effect)]3%108
  14. Convulsion[seizure]2.9%104
  15. Elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT)[a liver enzyme above the normal range]2.8%103

Single ingredients, pooled

Species

Dog72.6%2,629
Cat12.5%452
Horse0.8%30
Other or not given14.1%510

Questions about June 2000

How many animal drug adverse event reports did FDA receive in June 2000?

3,621 reports are in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026. The same month a year earlier has 958.

Which drugs were named most often?

By active ingredient: selamectin (2,012), selegiline hydrochloride (714), carprofen (398), milbemycin oxime (50) and lufenuron + milbemycin oxime (40). Brands are masked in the public data.

Which signs were listed most often?

lack of efficacy (ectoparasite) - flea (526), vomiting (452), depression (361), lack of efficacy (ectoparasite) - tick NOS (326) and anorexia (318).

Can the count for a month still change?

Yes. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Older months change little.

Does a busy month mean something went wrong that month?

Not by itself. The date is when FDA received the report, not when the event happened, and volume follows season, product launches and publicity. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources."

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. The month is the date FDA first received the report, not the date of the event. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.