Pet Drug Reports

Drugs by active ingredient

Drug · single active ingredient

Tylosin Tartrate: adverse event reports

All products with this active ingredient · 4 FDA-approved applications in the Green Book

513reports naming this ingredient, 2011–20260% of all reports · about 35 a year
31reports, 12 months to March 202638 in the 12 months before
25%classed serious, as reportedof 408 reports stating it
6.2%record death or euthanasia, as reported32 reports
64.9%of reports concern dogs0% of all dog reports

513 adverse event reports in FDA's database list a drug whose active ingredient is recorded as tylosin tartrate. The earliest was received in August 2011, the latest in March 2026. The Green Book lists 4 FDA-approved applications with this single active ingredient.

openFDA masks the brand and manufacturer in every report, so these figures describe the ingredient across all products and cannot be attributed to a brand.

In the 12 months to March 2026, 31 reports named it, down 18% from 38 in the 12 months before. Recent months are provisional: fDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Over its whole reporting history that is about 35 reports a year and 0% of all 1,357,245 reports (0% of all dog reports). How many animals received it is not published, so a count says nothing about how often a problem occurs per dose.

The signs named most often are lack of efficacy - NOS (11.1%), diarrhoea (10.3%) and vomiting (8.6%). A report can list several signs, so shares add to more than 100%; 493 different terms appear across these reports. Lack of efficacy - NOS appears in 11.1% of these reports, about the same share as in the pooled reports for every drug containing tylosin tartrate (9.8%).

64.9% of reports concern dogs. Not every report describes illness: 17.5% were filed wholly or partly as lack of expected effectiveness and 25.3% as product or packaging defects. Of reports that state seriousness, 25% were classed as serious, and 6.2% of all reports record a death or euthanasia as an outcome, as reported. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part.

Monthly reports by species, five years

Dog100 · peak 6
Apr 2021: 2May 2021: 6Jun 2021: 1Jul 2021: 1Aug 2021: 3Sep 2021: 2Oct 2021: 5Nov 2021: 2Dec 2021: 1Jan 2022: 2Feb 2022: 1Apr 2022: 1Sep 2022: 1Oct 2022: 1Nov 2022: 1Jan 2023: 1Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 4Jul 2023: 3Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 4Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 2Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 2May 2024: 3Jun 2024: 3Jul 2024: 1Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 5Oct 2024: 3Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 4Jan 2025: 3Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 3May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 1Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 4Nov 2025: 3Dec 2025: 2Feb 2026: 3Mar 2026: 12022202320242025
Cat6 · peak 2
Jun 2021: 1Jan 2022: 1Nov 2022: 1Aug 2024: 1Oct 2025: 22022202320242025
Horse0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Other50 · peak 3
Apr 2021: 2May 2021: 1Jul 2021: 1Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 2Feb 2022: 1Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 2Jul 2022: 1Oct 2022: 2Dec 2022: 1Feb 2023: 1Apr 2023: 1May 2023: 3Jun 2023: 1Aug 2023: 1Sep 2023: 3Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 1Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 1May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 1Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 1Jan 2025: 1Feb 2025: 1Mar 2025: 3Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 1Sep 2025: 1Oct 2025: 1Feb 2026: 3Mar 2026: 22022202320242025

Reports by the month FDA received them. Each panel has its own scale; the peak month is printed at the top right. The newest months are incomplete because FDA posts reports with a delay of three to six months.

Reports by year received

022442011: 920112012: 3620122013: 2720132014: 3020142015: 4120152016: 4120162017: 4320172018: 4420182019: 4020192020: 3420202021: 4420212022: 1820222023: 3120232024: 3520242025: 3120252026: 92026

2026 covers reports received through March 2026 only.

Signs listed in reports

share of tylosin tartrate reports listing the termall drugs containing tylosin tartrateall dog reports

  1. Lack of efficacy - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect]11.1%57
  2. Diarrhoea[diarrhea]10.3%53
  3. Vomiting8.6%44
  4. Unpalatable[legacy FDA term: the animal would not take it]7.4%38
  5. Lethargy[unusually tired or inactive]6.4%33
  6. Emesis[vomiting]5.7%29
  7. Other abnormal test result NOS[abnormal laboratory result, type not specified]5.3%27
  8. Death4.3%22
  9. Color, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]3.3%17
  10. Behavioural disorder NOS[behaviour change, type not specified]3.1%16
  11. Product problem[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]3.1%16
  12. Underfilling, Container[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]2.9%15
  13. Anorexia[not eating]2.7%14
  14. Ineffective, antibiotic[legacy FDA term: the product did not have the expected effect (antibiotic)]2.7%14
  15. Death by euthanasia[the animal was euthanized]2.3%12
  16. Digestive tract disorder NOS[digestive problem, type not specified]2.3%12
  17. Bad taste2.1%11
  18. Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]2.1%11
  19. Odor, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.9%10
  20. Appearance, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.8%9
  21. Ataxia[unsteady, uncoordinated movement]1.6%8
  22. Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (SAP)[a liver and bone enzyme above the normal range]1.6%8
  23. Hives1.6%8

Top 30 of 493 coded terms (VeDDRA, the veterinary reporting dictionary; plain-language gloss in brackets). One report can list several terms. The ticks show how often the same term appears in a wider pool of reports; they describe the reports, and FDA cautions that such figures cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand.

Outcomes and report types

Outcome recorded in the report

Recovered/Normal20.3%104
Recovered with Sequela3.9%20
Ongoing20.5%105
Died4.3%22
Euthanized2.3%12
Outcome Unknown31%159

What kind of report it was

Safety issue56.9%292
Lack of expected effectiveness6.6%34
Both safety and lack of expected effectiveness10.9%56
Manufacturing or product defect25.3%130
Other0.2%1

Coloured bar: reports naming tylosin tartrate. Grey bar: all 1,357,245 reports in the database. Outcomes are the status at the time of the last report, as stated by the reporter; a report covering several animals can carry more than one outcome. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part in any outcome.

Species and breeds in the reports

Species

Dog64.9%333
Human exposure4.9%25
Chicken3.9%20
Cat3.5%18
Pig1.6%8
Cattle0.8%4

Single-breed animals

Breed shares follow how common each breed is. Crossbred animals and reports with no breed stay in the species figure only.

Age, weight and route

Age of the animal

Under 1 year8.8%45
1 to 3 years11.5%59
4 to 7 years11.5%59
8 to 11 years20.1%103
12 years and over16.6%85
Age not given31.6%162

Weight of the animal

Under 5 kg (11 lb)9.9%51
5 to 9.9 kg (11–22 lb)13.6%70
10 to 24.9 kg (22–55 lb)15.4%79
25 to 44.9 kg (55–99 lb)16.4%84
45 kg and over (99 lb+)4.5%23
Weight not given40.2%206

Route of administration stated in reports: oral (323), cutaneous (4), ophthalmic (3), respiratory (inhalation) (3), topical (3), intraocular (1).

In context

MeasureTylosin TartrateAll drugs containing tylosin tartrateAll dog reportsAll reports
Reports513621985,6751,357,245
Share of that pool's reports naming this drug—82.6%0%0%
Classed serious, of reports stating it25%26%38.3%38.6%
Death or euthanasia recorded, per 1,000 reports62.41455563.8
Filed as lack of expected effectiveness (wholly or partly)17.5%——23%
Top term, share of reportsLack of efficacy - NOS 11.1%9.8%4.4%—

The tylosin tartrate pool is every report naming tylosin tartrate alone or in any combination; this single-ingredient set accounts for 82.6% of it. Shares are of reports, not of animals treated. The number of doses sold is not public, so none of these figures is a rate of occurrence, and differences between columns reflect which animals receive a drug and who reports as much as anything else.

Other ingredient sets sharing an ingredient

Active ingredientsReportsLatest 12 months
Estradiol + Tylosin Tartrate740
Estradiol + Trenbolone Acetate + Tylosin Tartrate314

Listed for navigation, ordered by report count. FDA states that these data "cannot be used to estimate the risk associated with the product or compare one drug or device product with another": drugs differ in formulation, in the animals they are given to, in sales volume and in years on the market. A report's ingredient field can be incomplete, so reports about one product may sit under more than one set.

FDA-approved products containing tylosin tartrate (Green Book)

Reference information, not report statistics. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The list below is the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026; nothing on this page says which of these products, if any, a report concerned.

Trade nameActive ingredientsSponsorApproved forApplication
Tylan SolubleTylosin TartrateElanco US Inc.Swine, Chickens, TurkeysNADA 013-076
BiloVetTylosin TartrateBimeda Animal Health Ltd.Swine, Chickens, TurkeysANADA 200-455
Tylovet SolubleTylosin TartrateHuvepharma EOODSwine, Chickens, TurkeysANADA 200-473
Tylan Injectableapproval voluntarily withdrawnTylosin TartrateElanco Animal Health, A Division of Eli Lilly & Co.—NADA 012-585

Species are the major species the Green Book search lists for the application ("—" where it lists another species or none). Approval dates are not part of the Green Book listing files and are not shown. Pioneer applications (NADA) come first, then generics (ANADA).

Questions about tylosin tartrate reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for tylosin tartrate?

513 reports record a drug with tylosin tartrate as its active ingredient in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through March 2026. 31 of them arrived in the latest 12 months.

Which brand do these reports concern?

That cannot be known from the public data. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The Green Book lists 4 approved applications with this ingredient alone; the reference list on this page names them without any counts.

What signs are reported most often?

lack of efficacy - NOS (11.1%), diarrhoea (10.3%), vomiting (8.6%), unpalatable (7.4%) and lethargy (6.4%). These are the coded terms listed in reports; several can appear in one report, and a term's presence is not a finding that the drug was responsible.

Which species and breeds appear in these reports?

dog (64.9%), human exposure (4.9%) and chicken (3.9%). Among single-breed animals the most frequent labels are German Shepherd Dog, Labrador Retriever, Maltese and Greyhound; popular breeds appear often in any drug's reports because there are more of them.

Are reports rising?

31 reports in the 12 months to March 2026, down 18% from 38 in the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Counts also move with sales, publicity and time on the market.

Do these reports show that tylosin tartrate harms pets?

Report counts cannot show that. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources." FDA also notes that commonly used products may have more reports simply because more animals receive them.

Are these the side effects of tylosin tartrate?

They are signs listed in reports, not an established list of side effects. The adverse reactions observed in studies are printed on each product's FDA-approved label, which a veterinarian can go through with you. This page is a record of what was reported to FDA.

How do I report a problem with an animal drug?

FDA asks owners and veterinarians to call the drug company first (the number is on the label); companies must pass reports to FDA. Reports can also go directly to FDA on Form FDA 1932a. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. Drug entries are grouped by the active ingredients their unmasked ingredient field discloses; the application number that records also carry is not used. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.