Pet Drug Reports

Drugs by active ingredient › Florfenicol + Flunixin

Drug · combination of 2 active ingredients

Florfenicol + Flunixin: adverse event reports

All products with this ingredient combination · 1 FDA-approved application in the Green Book

433reports naming this combination, 2010–20260% of all reports · about 27 a year
15reports, 12 months to March 202652 in the 12 months before
75.4%classed serious, as reportedof 211 reports stating it
57.7%record death or euthanasia, as reported250 reports
68.4%of reports concern cattle1% of all cattle reports

Between May 2010 and March 2026 FDA received 433 adverse event reports listing a drug with the combination florfenicol and flunixin as the recorded active ingredients. The Green Book lists 1 FDA-approved application with exactly this combination.

openFDA masks the brand and manufacturer in every report, so these figures describe the ingredient combination across all products and cannot be attributed to a brand.

In the 12 months to March 2026, 15 reports named it, down 71% from 52 in the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Over its whole reporting history that is about 27 reports a year and 0% of all 1,357,245 reports (1% of all cattle reports). How many animals received it is not published, so a count says nothing about how often a problem occurs per dose.

The signs named most often are death (44.1%), lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS (23.8%) and lack of efficacy - NOS (21.5%). A report can list several signs, so shares add to more than 100%; 222 different terms appear across these reports. Death appears in 44.1% of these reports, a larger share than in the pooled reports for every drug containing flunixin (34.6%).

68.4% of reports concern cattle. Not every report describes illness: 32.1% were filed wholly or partly as lack of expected effectiveness and 19.6% as product or packaging defects. Of reports that state seriousness, 75.4% were classed as serious, and 57.7% of all reports record a death or euthanasia as an outcome, as reported. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part.

Monthly reports by species, five years

Dog0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Cat0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Horse0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Other145 · peak 9
Apr 2021: 2May 2021: 1Jul 2021: 2Aug 2021: 1Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 1Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 1Jan 2022: 1Mar 2022: 2Apr 2022: 3May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 1Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 3Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 3Nov 2022: 2Dec 2022: 4Jan 2023: 3Feb 2023: 4Mar 2023: 2Apr 2023: 2May 2023: 2Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 2Aug 2023: 1Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 4Dec 2023: 4Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 3Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 6May 2024: 4Jun 2024: 9Jul 2024: 3Aug 2024: 7Sep 2024: 6Oct 2024: 5Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 7Jan 2025: 2Feb 2025: 1Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 4May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 3Oct 2025: 1Nov 2025: 3Jan 2026: 1Mar 2026: 12022202320242025

Reports by the month FDA received them. Each panel has its own scale; the peak month is printed at the top right. The newest months are incomplete because FDA posts reports with a delay of three to six months.

Reports by year received

031622010: 1620102011: 232012: 6120122013: 372014: 2520142015: 252016: 1620162017: 172018: 1720182019: 182020: 2620202021: 172022: 2420222023: 302024: 6220242025: 172026: 22026

2026 covers reports received through March 2026 only.

Signs listed in reports

share of florfenicol + flunixin reports listing the termall drugs containing flunixinall cattle reports

  1. Death44.1%191
  2. Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]23.8%103
  3. Lack of efficacy - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect]21.5%93
  4. PR-lung(s), lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the lungs]7.2%31
  5. Containers, Damaged[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]6%26
  6. Appearance, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]4.4%19
  7. Accidental exposure[exposure that was not intended]4.2%18
  8. Injection site pain[pain where the injection was given]4.2%18
  9. PR-gi, lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the gi]3.7%16
  10. PR-liver, lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the liver]3.2%14
  11. PR-spleen, lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the spleen]3.2%14
  12. Unclassifiable adverse event[event that fits no dictionary term]3.2%14
  13. Injection site swelling[swelling where the injection was given]2.5%11
  14. Containers, Leaking[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]2.3%10
  15. Death by euthanasia[the animal was euthanized]2.1%9
  16. PR-kidney(s), lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the kidneys]1.8%8
  17. PR-thymus, lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the thymus]1.8%8
  18. Anaphylaxis[sudden severe allergic-type reaction]1.6%7
  19. PR-stomach, lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the stomach]1.6%7
  20. Recumbency[lying down and unable or unwilling to rise]1.6%7
  21. Vocalisation[crying out or unusual noise]1.6%7
  22. Ataxia[unsteady, uncoordinated movement]1.4%6
  23. Defect Unknown/Not Specified[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.4%6
  24. Diarrhoea[diarrhea]1.4%6
  25. Lateral recumbency[lying on the side, unable to rise]1.4%6
  26. PR-lymph node(s), lesion(s)[legacy FDA term: lesions found in the lymph nodes]1.4%6

Top 30 of 222 coded terms (VeDDRA, the veterinary reporting dictionary; plain-language gloss in brackets). One report can list several terms. The ticks show how often the same term appears in a wider pool of reports; they describe the reports, and FDA cautions that such figures cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand.

Outcomes and report types

Outcome recorded in the report

Recovered/Normal10.2%44
Recovered with Sequela0.2%1
Ongoing19.2%83
Died56.6%245
Euthanized1.2%5
Outcome Unknown10.9%47

What kind of report it was

Safety issue48.3%209
Lack of expected effectiveness27.7%120
Both safety and lack of expected effectiveness4.4%19
Manufacturing or product defect19.6%85
Other0%0

Coloured bar: reports naming florfenicol + flunixin. Grey bar: all 1,357,245 reports in the database. Outcomes are the status at the time of the last report, as stated by the reporter; a report covering several animals can carry more than one outcome. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part in any outcome.

Species and breeds in the reports

Species

Cattle68.4%296
Human exposure9%39
Goat1.6%7
Sheep1.4%6
Pig0.2%1

Single-breed animals

Cattle1.6%7
Jersey1.2%5
Red Angus0.7%3

Breed shares follow how common each breed is. Crossbred animals and reports with no breed stay in the species figure only.

Age, weight and route

Age of the animal

Under 1 year43.2%187
1 to 3 years2.8%12
4 to 7 years0.2%1
8 to 11 years0%0
12 years and over6.7%29
Age not given47.1%204

Weight of the animal

Under 5 kg (11 lb)0%0
5 to 9.9 kg (11–22 lb)0.2%1
10 to 24.9 kg (22–55 lb)1.4%6
25 to 44.9 kg (55–99 lb)1.4%6
45 kg and over (99 lb+)48%208
Weight not given49%212

Route of administration stated in reports: subcutaneous (244), intramuscular (9), parenteral (7), topical (4), ophthalmic (2), other (2).

In context

MeasureFlorfenicol + FlunixinAll drugs containing flunixinAll cattle reportsAll reports
Reports43365731,2291,357,245
Share of that pool's reports naming this drug—65.9%1%0%
Classed serious, of reports stating it75.4%72.3%58.4%38.6%
Death or euthanasia recorded, per 1,000 reports577.445736863.8
Filed as lack of expected effectiveness (wholly or partly)32.1%——23%
Top term, share of reportsDeath 44.1%34.6%29.4%—

The flunixin pool is every report naming flunixin alone or in any combination; this combination accounts for 65.9% of it. Shares are of reports, not of animals treated. The number of doses sold is not public, so none of these figures is a rate of occurrence, and differences between columns reflect which animals receive a drug and who reports as much as anything else.

Other ingredient sets sharing an ingredient

Active ingredientsReportsLatest 12 months
Florfenicol + Mometasone furoate + Terbinafine5,487473
Florfenicol + Terbinafine2,27918
Florfenicol1,07354
Betamethasone Acetate + Florfenicol + Terbinafine61669
Flunixin21521

Listed for navigation, ordered by report count. FDA states that these data "cannot be used to estimate the risk associated with the product or compare one drug or device product with another": drugs differ in formulation, in the animals they are given to, in sales volume and in years on the market. A report's ingredient field can be incomplete, so reports about one product may sit under more than one set.

FDA-approved products containing this combination (Green Book)

Reference information, not report statistics. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The list below is the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026; nothing on this page says which of these products, if any, a report concerned.

Only one approved application matches this ingredient set. FDA's records still do not say which product a report concerned: the same ingredients are also dispensed as compounded, foreign-labelled and unapproved products, and the ingredient field is completed by whoever submitted the report.

Trade nameActive ingredientsSponsorApproved forApplication
Florfenicol and Flunixin MeglumineFlorfenicol, FlunixinCronus Pharma Specialities India Private Ltd.CattleANADA 200-796

Species are the major species the Green Book search lists for the application ("—" where it lists another species or none). Approval dates are not part of the Green Book listing files and are not shown. Pioneer applications (NADA) come first, then generics (ANADA).

Questions about florfenicol + flunixin reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for the combination florfenicol and flunixin?

433 reports record a drug with the combination florfenicol and flunixin as its active ingredients in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through March 2026. 15 of them arrived in the latest 12 months.

Which brand do these reports concern?

That cannot be known from the public data. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The Green Book lists 1 approved application with this combination; the reference list on this page names them without any counts.

What signs are reported most often?

death (44.1%), lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS (23.8%), lack of efficacy - NOS (21.5%), culture/titer data abnormal (10.6%) and death-treatment failure (9.9%). These are the coded terms listed in reports; several can appear in one report, and a term's presence is not a finding that the drug was responsible.

Which species and breeds appear in these reports?

cattle (68.4%), human exposure (9%) and goat (1.6%). Among single-breed animals the most frequent labels are Holstein-Friesian, Aberdeen Angus, Cattle and Jersey; popular breeds appear often in any drug's reports because there are more of them.

Are reports rising?

15 reports in the 12 months to March 2026, down 71% from 52 in the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Counts also move with sales, publicity and time on the market.

Do these reports show that florfenicol + flunixin harms pets?

Report counts cannot show that. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources." FDA also notes that commonly used products may have more reports simply because more animals receive them.

Are these the side effects of florfenicol + flunixin?

They are signs listed in reports, not an established list of side effects. The adverse reactions observed in studies are printed on each product's FDA-approved label, which a veterinarian can go through with you. This page is a record of what was reported to FDA.

How do I report a problem with an animal drug?

FDA asks owners and veterinarians to call the drug company first (the number is on the label); companies must pass reports to FDA. Reports can also go directly to FDA on Form FDA 1932a. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. Drug entries are grouped by the active ingredients their unmasked ingredient field discloses; the application number that records also carry is not used. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.