Drug · single active ingredient
Lasalocid sodium: adverse event reports
All products with this active ingredient · 1 FDA-approved application in the Green Book
- Mostly cattle reports
- Oral route most often
- Brands masked by FDA
FDA has received 251 adverse event reports in which a drug is recorded with lasalocid sodium as its active ingredient, from July 2011 to October 2024. The Green Book lists 1 FDA-approved application with this single active ingredient.
openFDA masks the brand and manufacturer in every report, so these figures describe the ingredient across all products and cannot be attributed to a brand.
In the 12 months to March 2026, 0 reports named it, against 5 in the 12 months before. Recent months are provisional: fDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Over its whole reporting history that is about 17 reports a year and 0% of all 1,357,245 reports (0.6% of all cattle reports). How many animals received it is not published, so a count says nothing about how often a problem occurs per dose.
Reporters most often listed death (31.9%), lack of efficacy (protozoa) - Coccidia (19.9%) and ineffective, coccidia (16.3%). A report can list several signs, so shares add to more than 100%; 135 different terms appear across these reports.
68.9% of reports concern cattle. Not every report describes illness: 49.8% were filed wholly or partly as lack of expected effectiveness and 8% as product or packaging defects. Of reports that state seriousness, 55% were classed as serious, and 47.4% of all reports record a death or euthanasia as an outcome, as reported. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part.
Monthly reports by species, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. Each panel has its own scale; the peak month is printed at the top right. The newest months are incomplete because FDA posts reports with a delay of three to six months.
Reports by year received
2024 covers reports received through March 2026 only.
Signs listed in reports
share of lasalocid sodium reports listing the termall cattle reports
- Death31.9%80
- Lack of efficacy (protozoa) - Coccidia[the product did not have the expected effect: coccidia]19.9%50
- Ineffective, coccidia[legacy FDA term: the product did not have the expected effect (coccidia)]16.3%41
- Lack of efficacy - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect]15.5%39
- Sudden death4.8%12
- Underdose[less than the labelled amount was given]4.4%11
- No sign[no clinical sign was reported]4%10
- Ruminal bloat3.6%9
- Diarrhoea[diarrhea]3.2%8
- Overdose[more than the labelled amount was given]2.8%7
- Death by euthanasia[the animal was euthanized]2.4%6
- Seizure NOS[seizure, type not specified]2%5
- Abnormal necropsy finding1.6%4
- Accidental exposure[exposure that was not intended]1.6%4
- Anorexia[not eating]1.6%4
- Bloated1.6%4
- Device Defective NOS[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.6%4
- Incorrect dose administered NOS[NOS: not otherwise specified]1.6%4
- Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]1.6%4
- Product Defect, General[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.6%4
- Unrelated death1.6%4
- Colic1.2%3
- General illness1.2%3
- Lack of efficacy (protozoa) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]1.2%3
- Lethargy[unusually tired or inactive]1.2%3
- NT - Abnormal necropsy finding NOS[NOS: not otherwise specified]1.2%3
- Potency, Low1.2%3
- Unable to stand1.2%3
Top 30 of 135 coded terms (VeDDRA, the veterinary reporting dictionary; plain-language gloss in brackets). One report can list several terms. The ticks show how often the same term appears in a wider pool of reports; they describe the reports, and FDA cautions that such figures cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand.
Outcomes and report types
Outcome recorded in the report
What kind of report it was
Coloured bar: reports naming lasalocid sodium. Grey bar: all 1,357,245 reports in the database. Outcomes are the status at the time of the last report, as stated by the reporter; a report covering several animals can carry more than one outcome. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part in any outcome.
Species and breeds in the reports
Single-breed animals
Breed shares follow how common each breed is. Crossbred animals and reports with no breed stay in the species figure only.
Age, weight and route
Age of the animal
Weight of the animal
Route of administration stated in reports: oral (228), topical (1).
In context
| Measure | Lasalocid sodium | All cattle reports | All reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 251 | 31,229 | 1,357,245 |
| Share of that pool's reports naming this drug | — | 0.6% | 0% |
| Classed serious, of reports stating it | 55% | 58.4% | 38.6% |
| Death or euthanasia recorded, per 1,000 reports | 474.1 | 368 | 63.8 |
| Filed as lack of expected effectiveness (wholly or partly) | 49.8% | — | 23% |
| Top term, share of reports | Death 31.9% | 29.4% | — |
This set accounts for 99.6% of all reports naming lasalocid sodium, so no separate ingredient column is shown. Shares are of reports, not of animals treated. The number of doses sold is not public, so none of these figures is a rate of occurrence, and differences between columns reflect which animals receive a drug and who reports as much as anything else.
FDA-approved products containing lasalocid sodium (Green Book)
Reference information, not report statistics. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The list below is the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026; nothing on this page says which of these products, if any, a report concerned.
Only one approved application matches this ingredient set. FDA's records still do not say which product a report concerned: the same ingredients are also dispensed as compounded, foreign-labelled and unapproved products, and the ingredient field is completed by whoever submitted the report.
| Trade name | Active ingredients | Sponsor | Approved for | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avatec; Bovatec 150 FP; Bovatec 68 Type A Medicated Article; Bovatec 91; Bovatec Liquid 20 (liquid Type A Article) | Lasalocid sodium | Phibro Animal Health Corp. | Cattle, Chickens, Turkeys, Sheep | NADA 096-298 |
Species are the major species the Green Book search lists for the application ("—" where it lists another species or none). Approval dates are not part of the Green Book listing files and are not shown. Pioneer applications (NADA) come first, then generics (ANADA).
Questions about lasalocid sodium reports
How many adverse event reports has FDA received for lasalocid sodium?
251 reports record a drug with lasalocid sodium as its active ingredient in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through March 2026. 0 of them arrived in the latest 12 months.
Which brand do these reports concern?
That cannot be known from the public data. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The Green Book lists 1 approved application with this ingredient alone; the reference list on this page names them without any counts.
What signs are reported most often?
death (31.9%), lack of efficacy (protozoa) - Coccidia (19.9%), ineffective, coccidia (16.3%), lack of efficacy - NOS (15.5%) and sudden death (4.8%). These are the coded terms listed in reports; several can appear in one report, and a term's presence is not a finding that the drug was responsible.
Which species and breeds appear in these reports?
cattle (68.9%), horse (4.8%) and turkey (4%). Among single-breed animals the most frequent labels are Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, Aberdeen Angus and Brown Swiss; popular breeds appear often in any drug's reports because there are more of them.
Are reports rising?
0 reports in the 12 months to March 2026, against 5 in the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Counts also move with sales, publicity and time on the market.
Do these reports show that lasalocid sodium harms pets?
Report counts cannot show that. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources." FDA also notes that commonly used products may have more reports simply because more animals receive them.
Are these the side effects of lasalocid sodium?
They are signs listed in reports, not an established list of side effects. The adverse reactions observed in studies are printed on each product's FDA-approved label, which a veterinarian can go through with you. This page is a record of what was reported to FDA.
How do I report a problem with an animal drug?
FDA asks owners and veterinarians to call the drug company first (the number is on the label); companies must pass reports to FDA. Reports can also go directly to FDA on Form FDA 1932a. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. Drug entries are grouped by the active ingredients their unmasked ingredient field discloses; the application number that records also carry is not used. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.