Pet Drug Reports

Drugs by active ingredient › Ketoprofen + Tulathromycin

Drug · combination of 2 active ingredients

Ketoprofen + Tulathromycin: adverse event reports

All products with this ingredient combination · 1 FDA-approved application in the Green Book

258reports naming this combination, 2021–20260% of all reports · about 55 a year
51reports, 12 months to March 202651 in the 12 months before
89.3%classed serious, as reportedof 224 reports stating it
61.6%record death or euthanasia, as reported159 reports
75.6%of reports concern cattle0.6% of all cattle reports

258 adverse event reports in FDA's database list a drug whose active ingredients are recorded as the combination ketoprofen and tulathromycin. The earliest was received in August 2021, the latest in March 2026. The Green Book lists 1 FDA-approved application with exactly this combination.

openFDA masks the brand and manufacturer in every report, so these figures describe the ingredient combination across all products and cannot be attributed to a brand.

In the 12 months to March 2026, 51 reports named it, close to the 51 of the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Over its whole reporting history that is about 55 reports a year and 0% of all 1,357,245 reports (0.6% of all cattle reports). How many animals received it is not published, so a count says nothing about how often a problem occurs per dose.

The signs named most often are death (57.8%), lack of efficacy - NOS (52.7%) and necropsy performed (13.6%). A report can list several signs, so shares add to more than 100%; 142 different terms appear across these reports. Death appears in 57.8% of these reports, a larger share than in the pooled reports for every drug containing ketoprofen (33.8%).

75.6% of reports concern cattle. Not every report describes illness: 58.1% were filed wholly or partly as lack of expected effectiveness and 14% as product or packaging defects. Of reports that state seriousness, 89.3% were classed as serious, and 61.6% of all reports record a death or euthanasia as an outcome, as reported. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part.

Monthly reports by species, five years

Dog0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Cat0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Horse0 · peak 1
2022202320242025
Other258 · peak 10
Aug 2021: 1Sep 2021: 9Oct 2021: 7Nov 2021: 6Dec 2021: 7Jan 2022: 6Feb 2022: 3Mar 2022: 2Apr 2022: 5May 2022: 6Jun 2022: 4Jul 2022: 4Aug 2022: 6Sep 2022: 5Oct 2022: 6Nov 2022: 8Dec 2022: 3Jan 2023: 3Feb 2023: 4Mar 2023: 1Apr 2023: 3May 2023: 5Jun 2023: 4Jul 2023: 7Aug 2023: 9Sep 2023: 2Oct 2023: 8Nov 2023: 6Dec 2023: 8Jan 2024: 5Feb 2024: 3Apr 2024: 5May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 5Aug 2024: 6Sep 2024: 3Oct 2024: 10Nov 2024: 9Dec 2024: 3Jan 2025: 4Feb 2025: 3Mar 2025: 2Apr 2025: 1May 2025: 4Jun 2025: 4Jul 2025: 2Aug 2025: 6Sep 2025: 9Oct 2025: 7Nov 2025: 6Dec 2025: 4Jan 2026: 2Feb 2026: 5Mar 2026: 12022202320242025

Reports by the month FDA received them. Each panel has its own scale; the peak month is printed at the top right. The newest months are incomplete because FDA posts reports with a delay of three to six months.

Reports by year received

030602021: 3020212022: 5820222023: 6020232024: 5020242025: 5220252026: 82026

2026 covers reports received through March 2026 only.

Signs listed in reports

share of ketoprofen + tulathromycin reports listing the termall drugs containing ketoprofenall cattle reports

  1. Death57.8%149
  2. Lack of efficacy - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect]52.7%136
  3. Intentional misuse[use that was knowingly different from the label]9.7%25
  4. Containers, Damaged[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]5.4%14
  5. Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]4.7%12
  6. Inappropriate packaging or design3.5%9
  7. Accidental exposure[exposure that was not intended]3.1%8
  8. Anaphylaxis[sudden severe allergic-type reaction]3.1%8
  9. Injection site swelling[swelling where the injection was given]3.1%8
  10. Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - Mannheimia haemolytica[the product did not have the expected effect: Mannheimia haemolytica]3.1%8
  11. Death by euthanasia[the animal was euthanized]2.7%7
  12. Closure, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]2.3%6
  13. Injection site pain[pain where the injection was given]1.9%5
  14. Lack of efficacy (mycoplasma) - NOS[the product did not have the expected effect: target not specified]1.9%5
  15. Lateral recumbency[lying on the side, unable to rise]1.9%5
  16. Containers, Leaking[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.6%4
  17. Fibrinous (broncho) pneumonia/fibrinous pleuropneumonia1.6%4
  18. Color, Abnormal[a product quality report, not a sign in an animal]1.2%3
  19. Fever1.2%3
  20. Lack of efficacy (bacteria) - Histophilus somni[the product did not have the expected effect: Histophilus somni]1.2%3
  21. Lack of efficacy (virus) - bovine viral diarrhoea virus[the product did not have the expected effect: bovine viral diarrhoea virus]1.2%3
  22. Pulmonary disorder NOS[NOS: not otherwise specified]1.2%3
  23. Recumbency[lying down and unable or unwilling to rise]1.2%3
  24. Seizure NOS[seizure, type not specified]1.2%3

Top 30 of 142 coded terms (VeDDRA, the veterinary reporting dictionary; plain-language gloss in brackets). One report can list several terms. The ticks show how often the same term appears in a wider pool of reports; they describe the reports, and FDA cautions that such figures cannot be used to estimate risk or to compare one product with another. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand.

Outcomes and report types

Outcome recorded in the report

Recovered/Normal12.4%32
Recovered with Sequela3.9%10
Ongoing17.4%45
Died60.9%157
Euthanized2.7%7
Outcome Unknown45.3%117

What kind of report it was

Safety issue27.5%71
Lack of expected effectiveness57%147
Both safety and lack of expected effectiveness1.2%3
Manufacturing or product defect14%36
Other0.4%1

Coloured bar: reports naming ketoprofen + tulathromycin. Grey bar: all 1,357,245 reports in the database. Outcomes are the status at the time of the last report, as stated by the reporter; a report covering several animals can carry more than one outcome. FDA has not necessarily determined whether any drug played a part in any outcome.

Species and breeds in the reports

Species

Cattle75.6%195
Human exposure9.3%24
Sheep1.9%5

Single-breed animals

Jersey1.9%5
Guernsey0.8%2
Red Angus0.8%2
Piedmont0.4%1
Hampshire Down0.4%1

Breed shares follow how common each breed is. Crossbred animals and reports with no breed stay in the species figure only.

Age, weight and route

Age of the animal

Under 1 year25.6%66
1 to 3 years2.7%7
4 to 7 years0%0
8 to 11 years0.4%1
12 years and over5.8%15
Age not given65.5%169

Weight of the animal

Under 5 kg (11 lb)0%0
5 to 9.9 kg (11–22 lb)0%0
10 to 24.9 kg (22–55 lb)0.4%1
25 to 44.9 kg (55–99 lb)0.8%2
45 kg and over (99 lb+)57.8%149
Weight not given41.1%106

Route of administration stated in reports: subcutaneous (181), other (6), ophthalmic (4), topical (4), intradermal (1), intramuscular (1).

In context

MeasureKetoprofen + TulathromycinAll drugs containing ketoprofenAll cattle reportsAll reports
Reports25862131,2291,357,245
Share of that pool's reports naming this drug—41.5%0.6%0%
Classed serious, of reports stating it89.3%85.2%58.4%38.6%
Death or euthanasia recorded, per 1,000 reports616.339936863.8
Filed as lack of expected effectiveness (wholly or partly)58.1%——23%
Top term, share of reportsDeath 57.8%33.8%29.4%—

The ketoprofen pool is every report naming ketoprofen alone or in any combination; this combination accounts for 41.5% of it. Shares are of reports, not of animals treated. The number of doses sold is not public, so none of these figures is a rate of occurrence, and differences between columns reflect which animals receive a drug and who reports as much as anything else.

Other ingredient sets sharing an ingredient

Active ingredientsReportsLatest 12 months
Tulathromycin3,162142
Ketoprofen3634

Listed for navigation, ordered by report count. FDA states that these data "cannot be used to estimate the risk associated with the product or compare one drug or device product with another": drugs differ in formulation, in the animals they are given to, in sales volume and in years on the market. A report's ingredient field can be incomplete, so reports about one product may sit under more than one set.

FDA-approved products containing this combination (Green Book)

Reference information, not report statistics. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The list below is the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026; nothing on this page says which of these products, if any, a report concerned.

Only one approved application matches this ingredient set. FDA's records still do not say which product a report concerned: the same ingredients are also dispensed as compounded, foreign-labelled and unapproved products, and the ingredient field is completed by whoever submitted the report.

Trade nameActive ingredientsSponsorApproved forApplication
Draxxin KPKetoprofen, TulathromycinZoetis Inc.CattleNADA 141-543

Species are the major species the Green Book search lists for the application ("—" where it lists another species or none). Approval dates are not part of the Green Book listing files and are not shown. Pioneer applications (NADA) come first, then generics (ANADA).

Questions about ketoprofen + tulathromycin reports

How many adverse event reports has FDA received for the combination ketoprofen and tulathromycin?

258 reports record a drug with the combination ketoprofen and tulathromycin as its active ingredients in the openFDA release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through March 2026. 51 of them arrived in the latest 12 months.

Which brand do these reports concern?

That cannot be known from the public data. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in adverse event records, so the reports counted here cannot be attributed to a particular brand. The Green Book lists 1 approved application with this combination; the reference list on this page names them without any counts.

What signs are reported most often?

death (57.8%), lack of efficacy - NOS (52.7%), necropsy performed (13.6%), intentional misuse (9.7%) and containers, Damaged (5.4%). These are the coded terms listed in reports; several can appear in one report, and a term's presence is not a finding that the drug was responsible.

Which species and breeds appear in these reports?

cattle (75.6%), human exposure (9.3%) and sheep (1.9%). Among single-breed animals the most frequent labels are Aberdeen Angus, Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Guernsey; popular breeds appear often in any drug's reports because there are more of them.

Are reports rising?

51 reports in the 12 months to March 2026, close to the 51 of the 12 months before. FDA posts reports quarterly with a delay of three to six months, so the newest months are incomplete and usually grow in later releases. Counts also move with sales, publicity and time on the market.

Do these reports show that ketoprofen + tulathromycin harms pets?

Report counts cannot show that. FDA states that "there is no certainty that the reported drug or device caused the adverse event" and that the event "may have been related to an underlying disease, other drugs used at the same time or other non-drug related sources." FDA also notes that commonly used products may have more reports simply because more animals receive them.

Are these the side effects of ketoprofen + tulathromycin?

They are signs listed in reports, not an established list of side effects. The adverse reactions observed in studies are printed on each product's FDA-approved label, which a veterinarian can go through with you. This page is a record of what was reported to FDA.

How do I report a problem with an animal drug?

FDA asks owners and veterinarians to call the drug company first (the number is on the label); companies must pass reports to FDA. Reports can also go directly to FDA on Form FDA 1932a. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Animal & Veterinary adverse event bulk files released 28 Sep 2026, which hold reports FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine received through 31 Mar 2026. openFDA masks brand and manufacturer names in these files, so drugs are counted by the active ingredients each record discloses and no figure is attributed to a brand, application or company. Ingredient names, and the separate reference lists of approved products, follow the FDA Green Book as of 1 Oct 2026. Drug entries are grouped by the active ingredients their unmasked ingredient field discloses; the application number that records also carry is not used. No report text, lot numbers or reporter details are published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.